天涯明月刀

전체 학생 줄었지만 ‘이주배경’은 늘어…초등생 20명 중 1명꼴_我的网站

A |     New Delhi, Oct 13 (UNI) One of the judges in the Supreme Court bench, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, differed with the view of his colleague, Justice Hemant Gupta on many issues.

Justice Dhulia said that asking a pre university schoolgirl to take off her hijab at her school gate, is an invasion on her privacy and dignity.

"Asking a pre university schoolgirl to take off her hijab at her school gate, is an invasion on her privacy and dignity. It is an attack on their dignity, and then ultimately it is a denial to them of secular education. These are clearly violative of Article 19(1)(a), Article 21, and Article 25(1) of the Constitution of India," Justice Dhulia said, in his verdict.

"Under our Constitutional scheme, wearing a hijab should be simply a matter of Choice. It may or may not be a matter of essential religious practice, but it still is, a matter of conscience, belief, and expression. If she wants to wear hijab, even inside her class room, she cannot be stopped, if it is worn as a matter of her choice, as it may be the only way her conservative family will permit her to go to school, and in those cases, her hijab is her ticket to education," Justice Dhulia said, in his verdict.

Justice Dhulia even went onto say that the unfortunate fallout of the hijab restriction would be that we would have denied education to a girl child. A girl child for whom it is still not easy to reach her school gate.This case here, therefore, has also to be seen in the perspective of the challenges already faced by a girl child in reaching her school.

"The question this Court would put before itself is also whether we are making the life of a girl child any better by denying her education merely because she wears a hijab!," Justice Dhulia questioned?

Our Constitution has visualised a just society and it is for this reason that the first virtue that is secures for the citizens is ‘Justice’ which is the first of our Preambular promises, he said.

On the other hand, the judge heading the bench of the Supreme Court, Justice Hemant Gupta, differed with the view of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and said that the Government (Karnataka) Order cannot be said to be contrary to the State goal of promoting literacy and education as mandated under the Constitution.

"Article 21A is not applicable as all the students are over 14 years of age. The students have a right to education under Article 21, but not of insisting on wearing something additional to the uniform, in a secular school, as a part of their religion," Justice Gupta, heading the bench of the Top Court said.

"Secularism applicable to all citizens. Permitting one religious community to wear religious symbols would be antithesis of secularism. Govt Order can't be said to be against secularism or objective of Karnataka Education Act," Justice Gupta in his 133-page, out of 209-page, verdict said.

"It can't be said that State is restricting the access to education to the girl students through such an Order. The Government Order only ensures that the uniform prescribed is adhered to by the students and it cannot be said that State is restricting the access to education to the girl students through such an Order, Justice Gupta said.

He went on to say that the Act itself contemplates providing of opportunities and facilities in a healthy manner and maintaining the dignity of childhood and youth so that there is no moral or material abandonment. "The uniform for the students has been prescribed so that there is no distinction between the students coming from diverse background and that each student grows in an environment of equality, fairness and equal opportunities," Justice Gupta said.

The uniform is an equalizer of inequalities. Therefore, prescribing uniform for children at an impressionable age is not only important but has a salutary effect on the mental development of the child to grow in the environment of oneness, he said.

Justice Gupta, find that the following 11 questions arise for consideration in the present appeals:

Whether the appeals should be heard along with Kantaru Rajeevaru (Right to Religion) and/or should the present appeals be referred to the Constitution Bench.?

Whether the State Government could delegate its decision to implement the wearing of uniform by the College Development Committee or the Board of Management or otherwise on headscarves is ex facie violative of Section 143 of the Act?

What is ambit and scope of the right to freedom of ‘conscience’ and ‘religion’ under Article 25? What is the ambit and scope of essential religious practices under Article 25 of the Constitution?

UNI SM BAV GNK。    유치원·초중고 19만명, 학교 140개 감소 속 이주배경 학생 8630명 증가대학 등 외국인 유학생, 21% 늘어 30만명 첫 돌파…교원 수는 ‘제자리’                   올해 한국 초등학생 20명 중 1명은 이주배경 학생으로 나타났다. 저출생으로 전체 학생 수는 빠르게 줄어드는데 이주배경 학생은 증가하면서 교실 풍경도 달라지고 있다.교육부와 한국교육개발원이 26일 발표한 ‘2026년 교육기본통계’를 보면 지난 4월1일 기준 유치원과 초중고교 등의 학생 수는 536만2281명으로 지난해보다 18만9007명(3.4%) 감소했다. 특히 초등학생은 221만9370명으로 12만6118명(5.4%) 줄어 감소폭이 가장 컸다. 중학생은 133만8750명으로 3만1606명(2.3%), 고등학생은 127만9392명으로 2만74명(1.5%) 감소했다.초중고교와 각종학교의 이주배경 학생은 21만838명으로 지난해보다 8630명(4.3%) 증가했다. 전체 학생에서 이주배경 학생이 차지하는 비율은 지난해 4.0%에서 4.3%로 커졌다. 초등학교의 이주배경 학생 비율이 5.3%로 가장 높았다. 초등학생 약 20명 중 1명꼴이다. 이주배경 초등학생은 11만8655명으로 1년 새 2054명(1.8%) 늘었다.이주배경 학생 증가세는 중고등학교에서 더 가팔랐다. 이주배경 중학생은 5만3501명으로 지난해보다 2329명(4.6%) 늘었고, 고등학생은 3만7660명으로 4038명(12.0%) 증가했다. 전체 학생 중 이주배경 학생 비율은 중학교 4.0%, 고등학교 2.9%였다.유형별로는 국내에서 태어난 국제결혼가정 학생이 13만8736명으로 전체 이주배경 학생의 65.8%를 차지했다. 외국인가정 학생은 5만8562명(27.8%), 중도입국 학생은 1만3540명(6.4%)이었다.2021년 16만58명이었던 이주배경 학생은 올해 21만838명으로 5년 사이 5만780명(31.7%) 늘었다. 같은 기간 유치원과 초중고교 등의 전체 학생 수는 595만7118명에서 536만2281명으로 59만4837명(10.0%) 감소했다.대학 등 고등교육기관의 외국인 유학생 증가폭도 크다. 외국인 유학생은 30만7464명으로 지난해보다 5만4030명(21.3%) 늘어 처음 30만명을 넘었다. 지난해 처음 25만명을 돌파한 데 이어 1년 만에 30만명 선도 넘어섰다. 학생 수가 빠르게 줄어드는 것과 달리 교원과 학교 수의 변화폭은 상대적으로 작았다. 유치원과 초중고교 등의 교원은 50만5545명으로 지난해보다 594명(0.1%) 감소했다. 초등학교 교원은 1599명 줄었지만 중학교는 196명, 고등학교는 217명 증가했다. 교원 1인당 학생 수는 유치원 8.5명, 초등학교 11.6명, 중학교 11.5명, 고등학교 10.0명으로 모든 학교급에서 전년보다 감소했다.학교 수는 2만233개로 전년보다 140개 줄었다. 유치원은 167개 줄어 7973개가 됐고 초등학교는 1개 감소한 6191개였다. 반면 중학교는 9개 늘어난 3301개, 고등학교는 11개 늘어난 2398개, 기타학교(특수·각종학교 등)는 8개 증가한 370개였다.。

Current article:http://8gb.zhaoliebengkuaiwaigeqi.bond/news/20260826_48710.html

Published on:22:33:44